We coordinate with structural engineers and building services consultants to align technical inputs with the architectural design. Our work supports clients delivering coordinated, deliverable projects.
.webp)
Coordination failures are among the most expensive problems a project can have, and almost all of them are avoidable. We coordinate structural and building services information with the architectural design throughout the technical stage, integrating inputs as they arrive and resolving conflicts before information is issued for construction.
Detailed drawings, specifications and schedules are produced so the project can be priced, procured and built. Design responsibilities are pinned down and information is prepared for tender or for a contractor to manufacture and construct.
Look at the whole processThe result is a drawing set that agrees with itself. Contractors receive consistent information, site queries drop and the project avoids the delay and cost of resolving clashes in the ground or in the ceiling void.
We coordinate with structural engineers and building services consultants throughout the technical stage.
Technical inputs are integrated into the design rather than appended to it.
We align design across disciplines to ensure consistency in information and intent on site.
As early as structural and services designers are appointed. Clashes are cheapest to resolve while they exist only on drawings, and coordination left until information is issued for construction tends to surface in the ground, the ceiling void or the programme, where every fix costs more and takes longer.
Big Creative Academy
London
Planning secured for a modern teaching block with three fashion studios, a central hub and facilities. AEC led from sketch through planning and technical drawings, then managed construction on site.
View projectPrimarily structural engineers and mechanical and electrical consultants, plus specialists such as fire engineers, acousticians and landscape designers where the project includes them.
Information is exchanged and reviewed at agreed intervals, clashes and conflicts are logged and each issue is resolved with the relevant consultant before drawings are issued for pricing or construction.
No. We coordinate equally well with consultants appointed directly by the client. What matters is agreed information exchange, not the contractual route.
Clashes discovered on site, abortive work, variations and programme delay. Resolving a conflict on a drawing costs a fraction of resolving it in built fabric.
Structural and services strategies should be integrated from concept stage, with detailed coordination intensifying through technical design. Leaving it until construction information is too late.
Yes, where the appointment includes it. We can chair design team meetings, manage the information programme and track actions across the consultant team.
From schools to homeowners, we work closely with every client to deliver thoughtful, lasting architecture here’s what they’ve said about working with us.
We’re always up for a new challenge. Whether it’s a home, a school, or something completely unique.
